Skip to content
  • Login
Court TV

Court TV

courttv.com
What is your customer experience with Court TV?

Court TV Overview

The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.

Based on reviews, created with AI
Rating Distribution

2.2 star rating from 37 customer reviews, with 25% would likely recommend and a 67% unfavorable share; consumers are mostly dissatisfied about service, pricing, and support.

Positive Feedback

Viewers praise Court TV for providing a front row seat to trials and legal commentary, and some hosts and legal consultants receive consistent appreciation.

Negative Feedback / Risk Areas

  • Recurring complaints about excessive commercials and repetitive programming.
  • Frequent criticism of biased commentary and certain hosts.
  • Problems with audio/video quality and live coverage cuts.
  • Concerns about customer service, high price level, confusing membership billing and subscription practices.

Key Takeaways for Future Customers

  • Read Court TV reviews and terms before subscribing and confirm cancellation/refund policies.
  • Consider current provider availability and compare alternatives if commercials, sound, or bias matter to you.
  • Expect mixed experiences with customer service and membership billing.
View full overview ›

Media from reviews

Court TV asks for an opinion and then wants to charge $5.00 but reading the fine print...
Court TV - Karen Read Case - John O’Keefe’s ArmCourt TV - Reaching viewers around the worldCourt TV - Stalking, Sexual Harassing, Privacy Intrusion, Electronic Device use, Privacy...Court TV - Wade WilsonCourt TV - Wade Wilson - Image 2Court TV - Hot tip
View all media ›

Tired of being ignored?

PC collective complaint

Start a collective complaint today and gather other consumers facing the same issue with a company. By collecting 20 signatures, you can raise awareness, and your complaint will be sent directly to the company.

Start Collective Complaint
Show reviews that mention
people karen trial trials commercials case family john okeefe vinnie grant
Filter review
Sort by
Catherine C Woz
map-marker Ashburn, Virginia

Subject Concern Regarding Recent Commentary About Nurses

To whom it may concern,

I am writing in response to a recent segment in which it was stated or implied that women serial killers are often nurses and narcissistic.

As someone who has lived 65 years witnessing the work of nurses as a patient, family member, and human being, I felt compelled to speak up.

Nurses, in my life experience, are God's angels on earth. They are caregivers, advocates, comforters, and lifesavers. They work long hours under enormous stress, often putting the needs of others far ahead of their own. To broadly associate nurses with such harmful stereotypes is deeply unfair and dismissive of a profession built on compassion, ethics, and service.

While isolated criminal cases may exist in any field, they do not define the millions of nurses who dedicate their lives to healing. Words matter, and public commentary carries real weight—especially for a profession that has given so much, particularly in recent years.

I hope Court TV will consider the impact of such statements and strive for more balanced and responsible discussion in the future.

Respectfully,

Cathy Collazo

View full review
Cons:
  • Misinformed information

Preferred solution: Apology

1 comment
Larz Xgu

As bad as it is, at least it is not as bad as what Catholic priests are stereotyped as.

Sue M Axy

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer
| map-marker Ottawa, Ontario

Adrian Gonzales Trial

I dont understand why the camera is focusing on witnesss chests, which is offensive and not something I have ever noticed happening before during other trials. If the agreement is not to show their faces while testifying then show the questioning lawyer or point the camera elsewhere.

View full review
Anonymous
map-marker Orlando, Florida

Cox took away.courttv

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

I had court tv for long time as of January 1st its has been canceled cox said its not their doing its the network

View full review
Maryann P Pxy

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Court TV asks for an opinion and then wants to charge $5.00 but reading the fine print your to pay $48.00 monthly... what a rip off. By clicking “Confirm now”, I agree to the Terms of Service and Pr

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
Court TV asks for an opinion and then wants to charge $5.00 but reading the fine print...

Court TV asks for an opinion and then wants to charge $5.00 but reading the fine print you're required to pay $48.00 monthly... what a rip-off.

By clicking Confirm now, I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, to be charged the one-time join fee, and a $48 monthly membership fee today and each month until I cancel. I can cancel via My Account to avoid future charges.

View full review
Pros:
  • Good live court cases
Cons:
  • Tthey ask for your opinion but the phone listed is a scam

Preferred solution: Deliver product or service ordered

User's recommendation: Don't bother calling. It's a scam

Susan J Jgf

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Soundtrack way off

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

I told them what was going on; they said they were working on it. They then proceeded to tell me that for my inconvenience I would receive a $100.00 gift card.

All I had to do was give them my banking info. Can you say SCAM?

View full review

Preferred solution: Straighten out the audio

Catherine C Woz
map-marker Ashburn, Virginia

Nurses stereo type as serial killers

Subject

Concern Regarding Recent Commentary About Nurses

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing in response to a recent segment in which it was stated or implied that women serial killers are often nurses and narcissistic.

As someone who has lived 65 years witnessing the work of nurses as a patient, family member, and human being, I felt compelled to speak up.

Nurses, in my life experience, are God's angels on earth. They are caregivers, advocates, comforters, and lifesavers. They work long hours under enormous stress, often putting the needs of others far ahead of their own. To broadly associate nurses with such harmful stereotypes is deeply unfair and dismissive of a profession built on compassion, ethics, and service.

While isolated criminal cases may exist in any field, they do not define the millions of nurses who dedicate their lives to healing. Words matter, and public commentary carries real weight, especially for a profession that has given so much, particularly in recent years.

I hope Court TV will consider the impact of such statements and strive for more balanced and responsible discussion in the future.

View full review
Cons:
  • Some info are noting but drama
  • Misleading

Preferred solution: Apology

Resolved
Ann D Yks

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Resolved: Karen Read

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

Due to the ignorance and dismissal of the facts presented in the Karen Read investigation and trial in the responses of those representing Court TV, I will be deleting your channel from all my devices and will be blocking your channel on YouTube. I have been a faithful supporter and fan since the beginning and was thrilled when you became available again.

However, not for the first time, but absolutely for the last time, I am done with your biased reporting. Court TV is supposed to present the facts and have legitimate and fair commentary to help average American citizens understand the justice system and how it is designed to work. Now, however, it is not about truth and justice; it is about ignoring the facts to support prosecutions, whether they are legitimate or not. If this is going to continue to be the direction you want to go, I will no longer be engaged in any manner.

Do your job better. Demand and represent truth, justice, and integrity in investigations and prosecutions. Apologize to Karen Read and call out the insidious investigation and the subsequent trial. Call out those responsible for the failure to truly get justice for John O'Keefe and his family.

Either stand for the truth or get off the air. Furthermore, I wouldn't listen to Julie Grant if you paid me to. It is quite obvious that she has no place in truth and justice.

I doubt she would recognize either if they fell out of the sky and slapped down on her head. Do better or don't do it at all.

View full review
JeanRenee P

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Karen Read Case - John O’Keefe’s Arm

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
Court TV - Karen Read Case - John O’Keefe’s Arm

I am 73 years old and worked as a legal secretary/legal assistant for 38 years in Washington, DC. I am now retired and living in Desert Hot Springs, CA (15 minutes from Palm Springs).

In my opinion: John OKeefes scratches on his arm suggests to me that he may have been running and his arm was hitting branches from a tree or bush. Where are the clothes he had on?

View full review

User's recommendation: User-friendly

Jabbaar P

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Stalking, Sexual Harassing, Privacy Intrusion, Electronic Device use, Privacy invasion, Whistle Blower

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full
Court TV - Stalking, Sexual Harassing, Privacy Intrusion, Electronic Device use, Privacy...

Hello, I have a neighbor problem that has been going on for about 2 years. I have contacted the local police department, and they have not been able to get them to stop.

The owner of the home is a police officer. The two people that are harassing me are a husband and wife. They're related; the husband is the brother-in-law, and his name is Victor or Adrian B. Martinez.

They have a device that they use to look through my home to watch me take showers. I'm being stalked, sexually harassed, victimized, and they are also climbing on my roof every night with this cat and my game on my home internet IP address; also, my cellphone mobile data service. Please investigate; I need this to stop. 954 W.

Lindbergh Ave, Coolidge, AZ 85128. Victor or Adrian B.

Martinez; I don't remember his wife's name. They're victimizing me every day.

View full review
Pros:
  • Reaching out to the public
Cons:
  • Faster response

Preferred solution: Justice

User's recommendation: Neighborhood Invasion Intrusion

Sally H Mnb

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

BYE COURTTV!

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

I've been watching CourtTV since the mid-90s. I was ecstatic when it came back.

The last few years I've disregarded ignorant and sexist comments by guests because I love the trials. CourtTV allowing John Depetro on its airwaves after his dishonest and racist remarks against Juror 11 is unforgivable. I used to love Vinnie, but his panels were terrible, and I will never give Julie Grant a minute of my attention again.

I'm so disappointed. My first trial watched on YouTube, and I got to avoid the ASPCA and Medicare Part D infomercials!

View full review
Cons:
  • Dishonesty
  • Sensationalism
  • Sexist coverage

Preferred solution: Apology

Anonymous

Mdsweetwright5@***.com

Man in West Des Moines Iowa left 18 month old to DIE in a hot car! NO charges.

People are outraged. Including me who feels that toddler is dead and had NO VOICE

View full review

User's recommendation: I watch Court TV daily and want to see of this can be brought to your attention. I called the Polk County Attorney and they told me they could not tell me who the prosecuter was because NO charges were filed against this father who killed his child. Negligence child endangerment nothing. This was MORE than a tragic accident! Any suggestions? Parents are OUTRAGED. Responsible ones that is!

Jabbaar P

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Reaching viewers around the world

Court TV - Reaching viewers around the world

Letting the world know about today's situation is an ongoing problem that needs to be addressed ASAP!

View full review
Pros:
  • Justice for everyone
Cons:
  • Faster response

Preferred solution: Justice

Sara G Knz

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

Call back.

What CourtTV is doing to Karen Read is wrong. Nick Rocco is the only one who has any common sense.

We all know Albert and that family. I'm Sara Gibson from Canton, MA, 02021 my entire life. Brian Albert got into an argument at the bar I've worked at across from McCarthy's years ago. He has punched my ex-boyfriend in the face...

there's a dead body in his yard. Are you guys being serious? And it doesn't help as a trained professional. I understand keeping your jobs/protecting family and how Brian Albert is respected...

also, he did something very wrong. This is ludicrous wrong. John O'Keefe was killed at that after party... Karen saw him go in...

and apparently, all the witnesses never saw him? Honesty doesn't get you far in life. Those marks on John O'Keefe's body are due to a fight and their dog Kloe. Not a tail light.

Ridiculous. Where is Kloe? Every member of that cover-up looks like *** after trial one as they should... except Jen McCabe because she got her face redone (her husband and them all have blackmail on each other now).

They're definitely not having sex anymore... apparently, as they did the night of. That's a laugh. Higgins and Brian Albert...

were the drunk ones... on cocaine... O'Keefe walks in without Karen... and boom.

'Where's Karen?' That's all it took. No one premeditated a murder... they covered it up and it's disgusting. Stand up for what is right and someone say/do the right thing.

As minimal as can be. Make CourtTV the place for justice again. Because you look bad.

Godspeed. What about John O'Keefe and what he would have wanted?

View full review

Preferred solution: Justice

User's recommendation: Don't believe anything you hear.

Media Expert Talks

Disinformation: Russian and Chinese trolls among us

Disinformation: Russian and Chinese trolls among us

How to know what’s fake on social media? In this video, Prof. Darren Linvill from Clemson University Media Forensics Hub explains how disinformation works, common tactics of political propaganda, the role of trolls, hashtags, and how to spot fake news.

Prof. Darren Linvill
Prof. Darren Linvill

Darren Linvill investigates data messaging and context accompanied by inauthentic behavior on social media networks. He also examines misinformation and disinformation in the rising field of social media forensics and data monitoring.

Lolah Aqm

To comment on the speakers and anchors

stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full stars-rating-full

The commentators are biased as are all the speakers they bring on! Too many commercials Ive grown to hate court tv

View full review

User's recommendation: DON’T WATCH

Anthony D Ivc

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

General

I think Julie Grant should be fired for being bias. She brings on people who are only on her side with the Karen Read case.

It disgusts me.

Every other anchor on yalls show gets people on there who are from both sides. Please fix the issue.

View full review

User's recommendation: Keep reaching out!

Susan G Puo

This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ

Verified Reviewer

No one called me regarding my comment

I think it's disgraceful how there is not one supporter for the real victim here, and that's John O'Keefe.

View full review

Why Trust Reviews on PissedConsumer?

  • Professional auto and live moderation
  • 100% user-generated content
  • Equal opportunity and protection
  • Zero tolerance for fake reviews
  • Verified content
  • PissedConsumer is on the Inc. 5000 list

For more information read Blog article